I’ve owned three of the NAD 316BEE integrated amplifiers (website here). Using it with a borrowed U-Turn Orbit Basic (built-in preamp disabled) I found it to again be on a higher plane of noise-free operation than the pre-installed Orbit Pluto phono preamplifier. Only a few years ago, NAD’s 50Wpc C320BEE was the definitive answer in integrated amplifiers under $400 USD. Success. The volume knob is new and different but no easier to grip. NAD Electronics C 316BEE V2 Stereo Integrated Amplifier. The lineage is impressive, all the way from the 3020 of 1978 to the current C 328, with many “Best Amp” awards and five-star reviews along the way. I noticed much the same effect when I played Yerba Buena Bounce, by the Hot Club of San Francisco (200gm LP, Reference RM2503) -- but I also found something wonderful that I really love about the C 316BEE V2. In use with the NAD 316BEE V2 that 10khz bump in the AR-H1’s become less of a noticeable ear-sore (within the EDM genre) and more of a convincing charm. Putting the NAD 316BEE V2 in the hands of the uninitiated fared well in comparison to the Emotiva TA-100 (another amplifier I had brought along for review). However, in the immediate state of newness, the labeling looks clean and leaves the remote free from that all too common airplane-wreckage-smattering of screenprint and buttons that you’ll never use. Of course, I can’t know for sure what’s right, even though I attended the recording and mastering sessions for the album, but I did like this track through the C 316BEE V2 ever so slightly more. They are replaced by a total of eight recessed hex-head screws that doubly fasten the sides and now secure the top in four equidistant spots behind the front fascia. The combination of NAD and Acoustic Research headphones had me reaching for more and more from the EDM and modern pop electronic genres. Stepping up to my trusty Marantz SA8001 CD player, the NAD revealed that it would not be outclassed on either side of the chain in respects to refinement and noise floor. When you add it all up, the results from using the NAD’s new phono preamplifier improve the performance of the U-Turn in more than a worthwhile fashion. My source devices were a Music Hall Ikura turntable with an Ortofon Blue MM cartridge, a Musical Fidelity V90-DAC digital-to-analog converter, an Audioengine B2 Bluetooth receiver, and a Samsung BD-C6500 BD player. The controls moreover stay the same. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. The lineage is impressive, all the way from the 3020 of 1978 to the current C 328, with many "Best Amp" awards and five-star reviews along the way. She remarked, “The neighbors can’t complain if it sounds that good.”. So my advice is to take note of the information if it pleases you, but make no decisions about quality based on it and move on. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for NAD C 316BEE V2 Integrated Amplifier with Phono Stage at Amazon.com. Because the D 3020 V2 is much smaller, and is controlled mostly through its remote handset, using it is, in my opinion, less convenient and enjoyable. NAD built its name on small, affordable integrated amplifiers. * * * * . The highs lacked air, the mids some delicacy and voluptuousness, the bottom impact. EQ didn’t seem necessary with larger or more expensive speakers. 3 of ... NAD C316BEE V2 integrated amplifier. Considering the KEF and NAD system we were using was almost one tenth of the price of the Peachtree and Studio Electric system previously used, Vivian was now convinced that hi-fi sound was well within her reach. Scanning further along the back of the 316BEE V2 you find the usual warning and hazard labels, along with a specific designation of design and manufacturing locations. Change out your DACs or various digital connectivity devices at will. NAD Electronics633 Granite CourtPickering, Ontario L1W 3K1CanadaPhone: (905) 831-6555, SoundStage! The idea of the 316BEE V2 stays the same as its predecessor. Read Full Review. NAD’s C 316BEE V2 probably finds its closest competition in Cambridge Audio’s Topaz AM10 integrated amp-DAC ($299.95), in which virtually the same feature set is mated to a slightly weaker amp specified to put out 35Wpc (which means that its maximum undistorted output is 0.6dB lower). A small remote control is included. Some of my younger colleagues will complain that it lacks onboard Bluetooth; if you want that, you can add it with an adapter, available on Amazon for less than $20. At the farthest is a moving magnet phono stage input with ground and a gang of four line level inputs each color-coded red and white for stereo channel identification, and with corresponding source labels on the front of the device in mirrored fashion so as to accurately map the inputs function physically if rear visibility of the back panel isn’t an option. Exposed as that may be, the updated NAD now has more than one good side to look at. Paying attention to changing markets, it’s good to see that NAD was aware that entry-level integrated amplifiers will more likely be installed outside of the traditional stacked audio rack, and more on the same plane of display as a turntable. Hit the. On/off and input selector buttons are provided, as well as controls for NAD CD players. Coincidentally enough this exact information is located on the backside of the chassis but on opposite ends of the device, adjacent to the phono stage. For my review, the C 316BEE V2 was fed by a Bluesound Node 2i source and Burson Conductor 3X Performance DAC. The lineage is impressive, all the way from the 3020 of 1978 to the current C 328, with many “Best Amp” awards and five-star reviews along the way. Why is every recommendation followed by “ for the money”? While rated at only 20 watts per channel, it boasted a beefy power supply and fair amount of headroom, giving … The VPI Player’s built-in phono preamp has a texture of bass that lends itself to a realism with acoustic instruments that the NAD 316BEE V2 just couldn’t exactly render. The NAD 316BEE V2 does have the ability to play great recordings with proper justice, but also to submit to heartlessness when faced with a poor recording. I can see why NAD is proud to display this green attribute with a small screen printed logo next to the power mains switch. As grounding through any power cord alone is not achieved, this unit requires a grounded AC receptacle or separate earth ground. Also on the front panel are a headphone jack (1/4” phone plug) with a rather high output impedance of 68 ohms, and defeatable Bass and Treble tone controls. While setting up the system I remarked that the NAD 316BEE V2 was only a 40 watt integrated. Why NAD chose to go this round is beyond me, but again, I think it has something to do with being abundantly accurate and nearly foolproof for first-time users. For example, when I played “Words We Never Use,” from singer-songwriter Ron Sexsmith’s Ron Sexsmith (16-bit/44.1kHz WAV, Interscope), there was just a trace of difference in the sound -- a little bit more edge and detail in Sexsmith’s voice through the NAD -- but no difference in the sounds of any of the instruments. It’s been said before that the Vandersteen 2CE can be powered by an alarm clock, and though I won’t go that far, I will say that the NAD 316BEE V2 has no problem taking this 86db 4-way tower up to demanding levels that will astonish you when taking price tag differences into account. Characteristically I found it to be more open and detailed across all spectrums, having most in common with the Pluto in terms of bass. I started off with my trusty Grado SR60’s and was pleased with the NAD’s low noise floor and even-handed dynamics. Firstly (and most likely to go unnoticed) are the changes in the venting. What has changed at either ends is the rounded edges that sweep a smooth radius around to the sides of the new 316BEE V2, overall achieving a more refined and upscale look. Posted on June 30, 2018 by Eric Franklin Shook in Components // 4 Comments. Each time I have parted with one I’ve known it was to initiate a budding audiophile towards making a move into the hobby. Attach what works best for your listening habits. When it was replaced by the C325BEE, the price went up to $449, and NAD saw an opening for a new 40Wpc option, the C315BEE ($349). The Emotiva from the front facia controls on the other hand proved to be confusing at first for Vivian, and the text display menus accessible by the remote didn’t exactly help the situation without a guided run through or explanation of how to use the four-way toggle controls. As far as audiophile components go, I can’t think of one that is more well-thought-out and as future proof as the new NAD 316BEE V2. Aside from its retuning and refining of the original, NAD has kitted the amp out with a moving magnet phono stage to reflection of the rise in vinyl sal… NAD C355BEE Amplifier review. I first tried gently reducing the bass about one-quarter turn counterclockwise, but this wasn’t enough. You will receive a confirmation email once your review has been published. "The NAD C 316BEE V2 reminded me that audiophile-quality sound doesn’t have to be complicated or expensive.